India Chooses Its Own Path: Why It Didn’t Join SCO’s Condemnation of Israel
When India Walked Its Own Way at the SCO
So, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) just dropped a sharp statement condemning Israel’s airstrikes on Iran. Strong words—accusations of violating sovereignty, threats to nuclear safety, all of it. But guess what? India didn’t sign it.
Surprised? You shouldn’t be.
India’s not new to this balancing act. Whether it’s Ukraine-Russia, the Israel-Gaza conflict, or US-China tensions, New Delhi has quietly carved a niche for itself: strategic autonomy. It speaks when it needs to—but never because someone else says so.
Here’s the Thing: India Isn’t Picking Sides
On June 13, before the SCO even finalized its statement, India had already made its position clear. The Ministry of External Affairs called for restraint, dialogue, and diplomacy. No dramatic language. No finger-pointing. Just a sober, independent voice.
And the very next day? The SCO statement drops, and India distances itself. MEA clarified it didn’t participate in those discussions. Translation? “We won’t be a mouthpiece for any bloc.”
Honestly, in a world where foreign policy is often a team sport, India’s playing solo—and doing it well.
Why It Matters
Let’s break it down:
- Geopolitical Neutrality: India shares ties with both Israel and Iran. Backing one would strain the other.
- Strategic Autonomy: India’s foreign policy isn’t about pleasing global powers—it’s about national interest.
- SCO Dynamics: The bloc’s led by China and Russia. India, while a member, doesn’t always align with their worldview.
Think of it like this: India’s at the table, yes, but it’s not afraid to bring its own plate.
